One of their greatest mistakes throughout history was to allow us to engage in the study, understanding, and utilization of physics. They must have great regrets for their mistake ever since. It is now too late to take it back, out of our minds and out of our hands. As long as we can communicate we can share this dangerous knowledge of physics. In terms of our work and our time this is how physics relates the two.
Energy transfer can be used to do work, so power is also the rate at which this work is performed. The same amount of work is done when carrying a load up a flight of stairs whether the person carrying it walks or runs, but more power is expended during the running because the work is done in a shorter amount of time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_(physics)
So our time and our work, which has and will always belong to us, can be transformed into products and services. Products and services that some of us need and utilize, but not equally. Some of us work and spend variable amounts of time and consume the fruits of our work and time by selling them, in not so proportionally distributed manner. In order to maintain this system of inequality we must obey them who work and spend the least amount of time while they consume most of our work, most of our time, all the time. The only thing they actually do is organize our time and the place to do work.
This principle seems to conveniently have been forgotten outside the study of physics. Did we forget to include it or did they leave it out? Can we teach ourselves physics all over again including what may have intentionally been left out? If we all work, we all spend the same amount of time doing work, we should be beneficiaries of the product of all the work and all the time in the world. What is it they do? Are they smarter than us because they can “organize” us to do what we do for them? But we do not all do the same work, or work the same amount of time, or work in the same place. We are all different. This is why we can not organize ourselves because we are so different. So let us recapitulate what we have learned so far. We do all the work and own the time we do work but we are not equal, thus different, and they organize us, in order to exploit us. Because that is the only real thing they do. They take our work and time and sell it back to us while they keep most of it for themselves as middlemen. 0.1% of the population owns 95% of the land, the wealth, the resources, and have ultimate control of our time and work.
Energy conversion efficiency (η) is the ratio between the useful output of an energy conversion machine and the input, in energy terms. The useful output may be electric power, mechanical work, or heat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_conversion_efficiency
So we are not very efficient to ourselves but we are very efficient for them. We do all the work and spend all our time and take back very little while they do very little and take most of it from us. We contribute all the energy input into the machine and take very little of it out, while they contribute/input little and take most of our output. This last part goes even beyond the laws of physics, unless we consider our work and their work as part of the same system. This is a very ingenious energy conversion machine for them and a tremendously inefficient energy conversion machine for us. So it is in fact a physics problem, one that was never mentioned in their physics books that we printed, we transported, and we taught and learned in our classes. So we can talk of this energy conversion machine’s efficiency in our physics class.
One can not really conceptualize any type of work and any time spent that is not part of their machine. Except when we handcraft something ourselves for our own use, and out of materials we did not buy from them, or plant and raise plants, breed animals, fish with tools and instruments we did not buy from them. Only then do we experience a little autonomy from their machine. But it is such a deviant act to do so these days that one (of us) needs to keep it secret and remain silent about it. The very little time we have left to ourselves, outside the machine, we need to hide and work in private for ourselves.
In order to understand the efficiency of an energy conversion machine, we can consider a simple example such as a gasoline powered generator. If with one generator you use 1 liter of gasoline and get 5KWhr of electricity out and with an other you only get 3KWhr, you can say the first is much more efficient. Let’s say the maximum potential energy stored inside a liter of fuel is equivalent to 10KWhr and we only get 5KWh we can say the first machine’s efficiency is 50%, while the second one only has 30%. So the machine we consider and contribute most of the input while we take very little of the output is very inefficient for us and very efficient for them. All we need to do is improve its efficiency for us and inevitably this would decrease its efficiency for them. Furthermore we need to reconsider the reason and use of the machine and whether it meets our needs or whether we need to alter this machine or redesign a new one.
This process requires us, who struggle to do so, to realize that we are not really that different, and if we all work towards the same goals in a collaborative manner, within the realms of physics, we can improve our efficiency and create a better more efficient machine that addresses our needs. Whether this would be one big global machine or many different little ones based on the needs of the community is debatable but the debate could only take place among those who struggle and their communities. It can not be an academic exercise or a predesigned product for those struggling to follow. It is a product of struggle itself. And this is the separation between meta-physics and physics.
No comments:
Post a Comment